<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conservation &#8211; Enersim, Ltd</title>
	<atom:link href="https://energymodeling.net/category/conservation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://energymodeling.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 22:29:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The ‘Green New Scam’– REALLY?</title>
		<link>https://energymodeling.net/the-green-new-scam-really/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[radiant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://energymodeling.net/?p=248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ed Mazria argues that the Trump administration&#8217;s attack on building energy codes and appliance efficiency standards relies on misleading comparisons and obsolete building codes. He contends that modern energy codes, appliance and equipment standards, and smarter planning and building design, have saved Americans $3.48 trillion, reduced energy demand despite massive building growth, lowered utility bills, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-medium" src="https://www.architectmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2026/07/Article-image_1.jpg" width="2000" height="1103" /></p>
<p><em>Ed Mazria argues that the Trump administration&#8217;s attack on building energy codes and appliance efficiency standards relies on misleading comparisons and obsolete building codes. He contends that modern energy codes, appliance and equipment standards, and smarter planning and building design, have saved Americans $3.48 trillion, reduced energy demand despite massive building growth, lowered utility bills, and enabled renewable energy to replace fossil fuels. Rather than protecting consumers, he argues, eliminating or rolling back these standards would increase energy costs, sacrifice public health, weaken the electric grid, and slow the clean energy transition.</em></p>
<header class="article-header">
<div class="article-byline">By <a class="author url fn" title="Posts by Edward Mazria" href="https://www.architectmagazine.com/author/edward-mazria/" rel="author">Edward Mazria</a></div>
<p><time class="article-timestamp">July 16, 2026</time></p>
</header>
<div class="zonda-post-content article-content o-article" aria-hidden="true">
<div class="excerpt">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Trump Administration has been loudly warning the American public about a so-called “Green New Scam”—a narrative it is using as cover to “<a href="https://www.energy.gov/articles/trump-administration-moves-permanently-end-green-new-scam-appliance-mandates">permanently end</a>” energy-efficient appliance and HVAC standards and <a href="https://www.energy.gov/articles/energy-department-analysis-finds-proposed-international-building-codes-would-cost">roll back the 2024 International Energy Conservation Code</a> (IECC).</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Their message: Energy-efficient appliance and HVAC equipment standards “raise costs and disrupt consumer choice,” while updating to the 2024 IECC “would increase residential construction costs by more than $9.2 billion annually compared to the 2006 code levels.” This, they say, would saddle homebuyers <strong>with</strong> as much as $14,000 in extra construction costs with a 10- to 20-year payback period.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Simultaneously, they point to the energy demands of AI and hyperscale data centers to justify <a href="https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/meet-the-coal-plants-that-trump-and-ai-are-restarting/">keeping aging coal plants open</a> and incentivizing new fossil-fuel power plants, all while actively <a href="https://www.fastcompany.com/91571382/the-economic-cost-of-trumps-clean-energy-rollbacks-has-been-enormous-and-its-still-growing">stifling clean energy development</a>.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This administration’s narrative is the real scam. By relying on outdated and cherry-picked numbers, the administration is attempting to strip away policies that have in fact saved consumers trillions of dollars, all to prop up the flailing fossil fuel industry.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here are the facts:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.architectmagazine.com/design/the-green-new-scam-really/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">go to full article at Architect Magazine</a></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy Ignorance</title>
		<link>https://energymodeling.net/energy-ignorance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 14:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://energymodeling.net/?p=203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am continually amazed how many people write about a subject with certainty that they know what they are talking about who are ignorant of it. Writers that do not understand the crucial role of energy conservation offsetting production have no business writing about energy. Given that energy production is contributing to climate change, there [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am continually amazed how many people write about a subject with certainty that they know what they are talking about who are ignorant of it. Writers that do not understand the crucial role of energy conservation offsetting production have no business writing about energy. Given that energy production is contributing to climate change, there is a plethora of such authors these days. They emphasize the switch to renewable energy production to replace fossil fuels. Energy production pollutes on a vastly greater scale than does energy conservation. Energy conservation, both through changes in human behavior and the built environment, should be the emphasis. The problem is that energy production enables capitalists to accumulate capital, whereas energy conservation does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
